Quite a bit of activity on Wikipedia as of late

Apparently the thought police (meaning Kathryn Cramer and her merry band) don't like it when they're challenged by an individual who seems to know quite a bit about the story. I've noticed some interesting things up at Wikipedia; the editors themselves seem to be quite annoyed.

Ms. Cramer, please do not take this the wrong way, but your personal experiences and blog are simply not acceptable as material to be included on Wikipedia. The section you added fails the core policies of No Original Research and Neutral Point of View. Continuing to re-add the content will likely result in a block. A link to a news article about the arrest of an individual does not demonstrate any connection to GoDaddy. If you can find published sources (ala news sites) which discuss the matter you wish to include, then it can be cited. Please understand that my removal of such content is not a slight against you. Regards, Leflyman^Talk 21:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

To Cramer, though, this is a devastating blow to her self esteem, because she's so smart and famous, EVERYONE must BOW DOWN in her presence in AWE!

Kathryn seems to think she's the know-all and end-all of news and opinion.

Heh. Just like her contemporaries, Robert Young Pelton and Eason Jordan and his lot.

It was a relatively recent revelation that came to a group of us through email that yes, indeed, they are funded by a lefty with deep pockets at Iraqslogger; Jane Fonda's ex-husband, the one-and-only Ted Turner. Wasn't he the one who got the idea for CNN from someone like Fidel Castro? Oh, yes. And Fidel is 'such a nice man'.