Joe Cafasso aka Blackwood spouting off on Weapons of Mass Destruction

Cafasso's claims of bravery and heroism span the globe. He has claimed he fought in Vietnam, which is of extreme entertainment value since simple arithmetic tells us that's impossible; he's not old enough. Another standard theme for Cafasso's vivid imagination is this version; that he never actually made it to Vietnam, but instead, was fighting in Laos. A source from the UN UNIFEM contacted us and said that Cafasso posing as Blackwood this summer actually got up and spoke and embarassed a few people in the room becaues when he said he was working for Knightsbridge because he killed a 14-year-old when he was working a black op during Vietnam. The public admission of such a thing only equates to the tall tales of the fake veterans participating in the Winter Soldier Investigation. So we ask you: What kind of man stands up and publicly and states that he killed a child during a war that he never fought in???

More recently, Joe Cafasso still insisting he was Gerry P. Blackwood, told a Washington DC attorney he was fighting near where that attorney fought during the Vietnam War. That attorney believed him until the FBI called that attorney and straightened him out with the truth!

• In 1999 - Cafasso along with Serbian Americans was Anti-War!
• In 2001 - 2002, Cafasso claimed to know what was going on in Afghanistan more so than those on the ground. Even a noted Marine Colonel on air at FOX thought Cafasso was a baffoon before he was sacked.
  
• In 2004 on OUTFOXED, Cafasso was blasting FOX News. FOX discovered the false military credentials and false tales of nonexistent experiences, and pushed him out the door so of course, he was going to hold a grudge. Cafasso breaths revenge! Crikey, he is not man enough to accept responsibility for lying, so he needs to find someone to blame.
  

But that does not stop him from spouting off about Weapons of Mass Destruction! Here he is in the Radsafe group bragging in his usual pompous self aggrandizing manner:

Containing Weapons of Mass Destruction

· To: radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
· Subject: Containing Weapons of Mass Destruction
· From: "Gerry Blackwood"
· Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 18:02:20 +0000
· Reply-To: "Gerry Blackwood"
· Sender: owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu

Hello list,

Yesterday I attended the Columbia University East Central European Center, Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies, and SIPA UN Studies Program Lecture: Containing Weapons of Mass Destruction: The UN and the Non-Proliferation Treaty Speaker: Laszlo Molmar, Ambassador of Hungary to the United Nations.

Thought I would share some points for those interested in the NPT (Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty). Ambassador Molnar is a nice guy and surprisingly spoke openly and candidly. These were just a few of the highlights of the talk.

Who is Ambassador Laszlo Molnar of the Hungary UN MIssion? He is the outgoing Chairman of what is know as PrepCom or the Preparatory Committee of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

This Committee is meeting here in NYC on May 7th 2004. Prepcom tries to get a consensus on most of the issues prior to the main meeting of the NPT Signatories schedule for 2005, leaving the major items for discussion.

1. This years PrepCom is more complex than ever. This is due to the developments in Pakistan as in AQ Kahn, Iran and North Korea. BTW, NK has not officially pulled out of the NPT their seat has been turned over to the PrepCom Chairman as a holding action so that NK will not have to go through the readmittance criteria once the issues are resolved. However, there is a stand still on the issue of North Korea. Nothing has changed. The internal fighting over protocol continues while the parties agree to continue the holding action on NK seat. They do not want the horse out of the barn and lose total control over NK. Of course the Chinese have been limited in help as well. The most interesting item for this years PrepCom is that the conference report must be a consensus one unlike the previous one. Talk about civil wars........

2. The Non Aligned Nations are concerned with the lack of speed in the reductions of nuclear weapons by the P5 Nations. Their thinking is that if the P5 Nations would start showing leadership in this area this would send a strong signal to other non-aligned nations that may be interesting in pursuing nuclear weapons.

3. Iran and NK are interested in talks directly with the US but the US refuses to enter into one on one talks with them. Which the US Position is supported by the UN. The thinking is of course if one nation get's to talk one on one with the US everyone else will do the same. Of course the UN does not want to be totally left in the dust nor does the US want to become the UN. Remember of all the crap we throw at the UN as being ineffective, we use them as a buffer between us and the rest of the World.

4. The UN is looking for more teeth or a stronger enforcement clause to the NPT. Don't bet on it though.

5. The next NPT will have a Chapter Seven clause for the control of Special Nuclear Materials (SNM). However, this Chapter Seven is directed not as the normal Chapter Seven as in the case of Iraq or Kosovo, but its one that states the parties directly will take action within their own boarders. Of course if a party asks for help the Security Council will take up the issue. Then comes the big question, funding? I have to tell you this scares the hell out of me. I personally find it a act of stupidity if the UN and US Mission to the UN thinks this form of a Chapter Seven is even remotely workable. The black market is very large and covers many countries. The Ambassador agreed that SNM are a huge problem and one of the focuses of this next NPT.

6. TactNukes or tactical nuclear weapons. Lets say a, slight problem (sic). Reduction is not going as planned and with the US talking about low yield nukes as in bunker busters this next PrepCom will be a exciting one. The Ambassador pointed out that the US Spends Billions securing Russia's Nuclear Arsenal, of course this statement was corrected we spent only $740 Million on some of the arsenal helping the Russians better secure their weapons. This is not to be confused with the $4 Billion in total over the last decade. This $4 Billion is the total for the reduction and disarmament of Russia's Strategic Forces as well. Moreover, the Russian's told the UN they will not go into specifics with the US until the US removes its gravity nukes in Europe. The Russians have told the UN they only have nukes on their soil now and so should the Americans. Moreover, the Russian have told the UN and US that they will only be responsible for nuclear weapons on their soil. Meaning do not look at them for any nukes now located in their former republics or any other former Soviet nuke outside their boarders.

Proliferation of materials and technology is a rather large issue.

When asked about the russian inventory and statements made by russian defectors with regard to an accuurate count in the Russian arsenal the Ambassador said, that he believes that the Russians do not have a good idea of what is really in their arsenal. Just thought I would pass this one to you all so that you can sleep well tonight.

7. Lastly, when asked "does AQ have a nuclear weapon?" The Ambassador's reply was, "Who can say that they don't". Just in case the Russian arsenal problem didn't make you lose sleep.

I was surprised at the candidness of the talk......

Gerry Blackwood
New York, New York
PS: Please note the new e-mail address the old one is no longer useful since
it was struck by a virus. Hence the reason for my use of webmail and lists.

_________________________________________________________________
Persistent heartburn? Check out Digestive Health & Wellness for information
and advice. http://gerd.msn.com/default.asp

************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

This is what a silly twit he is.