See Cafasso's blog as proof that he has done what he can to stalk Idema. He published Joe Cafasso's letter to Jack Idema at that blog, claiming responsibility for Jack Idema's imprisonment in Afghanistan:This letter makes a lot more sense now, in retrospect...investigate Joe Cafasso!Monday, July 24, 2006
A Personal Letter to Jack Idema….
DISCOURAGED FORWARD! Junior Cape Crusaders Worldwide and our trusty side-kick Psychotic and Homicidal Lynn Thomas of COWS BLOC!Well Junior Cape Crusaders looks like our hero boy and his trash mouth girl friend are at it again. So we asked someone dear to Jackbo to write him a personal letter….
A Personal Letter to Jack Idema….
Hi Jack! Enjoying prison? You are getting everything you deserve plus some. Let it be known that it was never Ed Artis nor Bob Morris who had you hunted down and arrested but just little old me. And if there is anything else I can do to make sure you serve out your prison term I will. We both come from the same cut Jack, except what I was doing was not for fame and glory unlike you.
As far as I am concerned you need an extension ladder to crawl out of the gutter. I know for a fact you are as about as phoney as they come. You see Jack I have perosnal letters from the so-called Generals you worked with basically saying you were full of it and were never an advisor to the Northern Front. The evidence against you is just overwhelming. Please send a Carabolla TV crew to me so I can have all of this documented. Talk about Edward Carabolla and Ted Kavanagh… You just love to use people Jack especially those in there 70’s and 80’s. Just like you used Robin Moore. How do you sleep nights?
Yes Jack I know it was Ted Kavanagh who hired John Tiffany. I know it was Ted Kavanagh who got Peter Bergen to lower his standards and write about you. Please have Peter Bergen contact me I would just love to sit down with him and show him what I got! You have to wonder why CNN, CBS, MSNBC and the rest of the Networks will have nothing to do with you? They know the truth! How many reporters can you threaten Jack? How many people can you defame?
Those of us who know the truth on how you scammed the US Embassy in Tashkent know the real Jack Idema. You have caused many people harm in the past and now your getting yours in return. So what do you and Ms. Thomas do since you can’t show any evidence? Defame others. Nice try Jack! But you are too well known for this tactic. Please come home soon I am waiting for the day you return so I can drag you into court and prove once and for all just how much your full of it.
As far as Ms. Thomas here is concerned it was also me who wrote to and called Allstate Insurance having you banned from using Allstate Computers to defame others. Yes Ms. Thomas I was at Tribeca to see the opening of “Beyond the Call”. A story about real American Hero’s.. Not like you Jack… Not like the dream and lie you live but three guys who shoes you could never fill.
Ms. Thomas. To bad the guy with the eye patch was not me. But I was proudly standing next to him for a while. Believe me it was my honor.. Again Ms. Thomas you speak without knowledge just because you enjoy propelling a lie as in Jack Idema.
So Jack why not just do what everyone has asked? Get a certified letter from the Army Inspector Generals Office shutting me up? Never going to happen Jack…. and I will never shut about about you. That’s because your full of it Jack. And everyone from Robin Moore to the SFA knows it. This is also the reason why you can’t prove anything in Court because if you could you would not be where you are right now. And you would have had standing in the Fox News Lawsuit. A law suit you have repeatedly lost. BTW Jack how much money do you owe some of the other parties? I laugh at you calling everyone else frauds while you are in prison now twice buying the services you now use.
Remember one thing Jack it was me who had that Detain On Sight Order come out and it was me who helped put you away. This was for the many you have hurt in the past.
So Jack while you once again seem to be enjoying the privileges of a Sat Phone to throw the BS around of which you and Mr. Tiffany just love to propel enjoy it while it lasts.
Enjoy Prison that is where you belong and where you will end up back in the States.
See you in Hell Jack!
Joe Cafasso
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
January 7, 2003 and December 19, 2003]
[CITE: 31USC3729]
TITLE 31--MONEY AND FINANCE
SUBTITLE III--FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 37--CLAIMS
SUBCHAPTER III--CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Sec. 3729. False claims
(a) Liability for Certain Acts.--Any person who--
(1) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer
or employee of the United States Government or a member of the Armed
Forces of the United States a false or fraudulent claim for payment
or approval;
(2) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false
record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or
approved by the Government;
(3) conspires to defraud the Government by getting a false or
fraudulent claim allowed or paid;
(4) has possession, custody, or control of property or money
used, or to be used, by the Government and, intending to defraud the
Government or willfully to conceal the property, delivers, or causes
to be delivered, less property than the amount for which the person
receives a certificate or receipt;
(5) authorized to make or deliver a document certifying receipt
of property used, or to be used, by the Government and, intending to
defraud the Government, makes or delivers the receipt without
completely knowing that the information on the receipt is true;
(6) knowingly buys, or receives as a pledge of an obligation or
debt, public property from an officer or employee of the Government,
or a member of the Armed Forces, who lawfully may not sell or pledge
the property; or
(7) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false
record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to
pay or transmit money or property to the Government,
is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not
less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000, plus 3 times the amount of
damages which the Government sustains because of the act of that person,
except that if the court finds that--
(A) the person committing the violation of this subsection
furnished officials of the United States responsible for
investigating false claims violations with all information known to
such person about the violation within 30 days after the date on
which the defendant first obtained the information;
(B) such person fully cooperated with any Government
investigation of such violation; and
(C) at the time such person furnished the United States with the
information about the violation, no criminal prosecution, civil
action, or administrative action had commenced under this title with
respect to such violation, and the person did not have actual
knowledge of the existence of an investigation into such violation;
the court may assess not less than 2 times the amount of damages which
the Government sustains because of the act of the person. A person
violating this subsection shall also be liable to the United States
Government for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any such
penalty or damages.
(b) Knowing and Knowingly Defined.--For purposes of this section,
the terms ``knowing'' and ``knowingly'' mean that a person, with respect
to information--
(1) has actual knowledge of the information;
(2) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the
information; or
(3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the
information,
and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required.
(c) Claim Defined.--For purposes of this section, ``claim'' includes
any request or demand, whether under a contract or otherwise, for money
or property which is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient
if the United States Government provides any portion of the money or
property which is requested or demanded, or if the Government will
reimburse such contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion
of the money or property which is requested or demanded.
(d) Exemption From Disclosure.--Any information furnished pursuant
to subparagraphs (A) through (C) of subsection (a) shall be exempt from
disclosure under section 552 of title 5.
(e) Exclusion.--This section does not apply to claims, records, or
statements made under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(Pub. L. 97-258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 978; Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2,
Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3153; Pub. L. 103-272, Sec. 4(f)(1)(O), July 5,
1994, 108 Stat. 1362.)
Historical and Revision Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3729................................. 31:231. R.S. Sec. 3490.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the section, before clause (1), the words ``a member of an armed
force of the United States'' are substituted for ``in the military or
naval forces of the United States, or in the militia called into or
actually employed in the service of the United States'' and ``military
or naval service'' for consistency with title 10. The words ``is
liable'' are substituted for ``shall forfeit and pay'' for consistency.
The words ``civil action'' are substituted for ``suit'' for consistency
in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
The words ``and such forfeiture and damages shall be sued for in the
same suit'' are omitted as unnecessary because of rules 8 and 10 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). In clauses (1)-(3),
the words ``false or fraudulent'' are substituted for ``false,
fictitious, or fraudulent'' and ``Fraudulent or fictitious'' to
eliminate unnecessary words and for consistency. In clause (1), the
words ``presents, or causes to be presented'' are substituted for
``shall make or cause to be made, or present or cause to be presented''
for clarity and consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words. The
words ``officer or employee of the Government or a member of an armed
force'' are substituted for ``officer in the civil, military, or naval
service of the United States'' for consistency in the revised title and
with other titles of the Code. The words ``upon or against the
Government of the United States, or any department of the United States,
or any department or officer thereof'' are omitted as surplus. In clause
(2), the word ``knowingly'' is substituted for ``knowing the same to
contain any fraudulent or fictitious statement or entry'' to eliminate
unnecessary words. The words ``record or statement'' are substituted for
``bill, receipt, voucher, roll, account, claim, certificate, affidavit,
or deposition'' for consistency in the revised title and with other
titles of the Code. In clause (3), the words ``conspires to'' are
substituted for ``enters into any agreement, combination, or
conspiracy'' to eliminate unnecessary words. The words ``of the United
States, or any department or officer thereof'' are omitted as surplus.
In clause (4), the words ``charge'', ``or other'', and ``to any other
person having authority to receive the same'' are omitted as surplus. In
clause (5), the words ``document certifying receipt'' are substituted
for ``certificate, voucher, receipt, or other paper certifying the
receipt'' to eliminate unnecessary words. The words ``arms, ammunition,
provisions, clothing, or other'', ``to any other person'', and ``the
truth of'' are omitted as surplus. In clause (6), the words ``arms,
equipments, ammunition, clothes, military stores, or other'' are omitted
as surplus. The words ``member of an armed force'' are substituted for
``soldier, officer, sailor, or other person called into or employed in
the military or naval service'' for consistency with title 10. The words
``such soldier, sailor, officer, or other person'' are omitted as
surplus.
References in Text
The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (e), is
classified generally to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
1994--Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 103-272 substituted ``1986'' for
``1954''.
1986--Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(1), designated existing
provisions as subsec. (a), inserted subsec. heading, and substituted
``Any person who'' for ``A person not a member of an armed force of the
United States is liable to the United States Government for a civil
penalty of $2,000, an amount equal to 2 times the amount of damages the
Government sustains because of the act of that person, and costs of the
civil action, if the person'' in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(2), substituted ``United
States Government or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States''
for ``Government or a member of an armed force''.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(3), inserted ``by the
Government'' after ``approved''.
Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(4), substituted ``control of
property'' for ``control of public property'' and ``by the Government''
for ``in an armed force''.
Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(5), substituted ``by the
Government'' for ``in an armed force'' and ``true;'' for ``true; or''.
Subsec. (a)(6). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(6), substituted ``an officer
or employee of the Government, or a member of the Armed Forces,'' for
``a member of an armed force'' and ``property; or'' for ``property.''
Subsec. (a)(7). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(7), added par. (7).
Subsecs. (b) to (e). Pub. L. 99-562, Sec. 2(7), added subsecs. (b)
to (e).
Increased Penalties for False Claims in Defense Procurement
Pub. L. 99-145, title IX, Sec. 931(b), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 699,
provided that: ``Notwithstanding section 3729 of title 31, United States
Code, the amount of the liability under that section in the case of a
person who makes a false claim related to a contract with the Department
of Defense shall be a civil penalty of $2,000, an amount equal to three
times the amount of the damages the Government sustains because of the
act of the person, and costs of the civil action.''
[Section 931(c) of Pub. L. 99-145 provided that section 931(b) is
applicable to claims made or presented on or after Nov. 8, 1985.]
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in sections 3730, 3731, 3732, 3733 of
this title; title 10 section 2324; title 15 sections 637, 657a; title 20
section 1078-9; title 41 section 256; title 42 section 1395i.
Gerry is a retired Lt. Colonel serving with the U.S. Army for 26 years.But he has the unmitigated gall to go far beyond that ridiculous claim:
Gerry served with the 179th Military Brigade/MACVSOG Command and Control South SVN, 1970-1972.Wow, what a surprise, we have another complete fabrication. Joe Cafasso is only 50 years old. He was born on August 2, 1956 and will be turning 51 in August of this year. He is simply NOT OLD ENOUGH to have served in any capacity during that period; except maybe STUDY HALL in High School. He should have still been in High School during the 1970-1972 period! Although there is speculation as to whether or not he graduated at all, considering his poorly developed grammar and writing skills. If he graduated, he would have graduated High School in 1974 or thereabouts (presuming he didn't flunk a grade). When you consider his inability to get along with people, I would further speculate that he had problems, not only at home, but in the neighborhood and school, during those years.
The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) 1972-1980 at various overseas posts. NATO Nuclear Liaison Officer 1980-1985.Ridiculous! To our knowledge, he doesn't even own a passport, under this fictitious identity that he's manufactured, or his own! He has never been out of the country at all.
After Gerry's assignment with NATO he returned to a special assignment at CIA and Center Lane.Anyone who REALLY KNOWS and UNDERSTANDS what he's talking about here should be on the floor laughing. Center Lane was completely abandoned shortly after it was begun. It was about 'remote viewing'. An explanation of what that is follows:
Currently, Gerry holds a DOD Top Secret SSBI, Yankee White, DOE Q Clearance and Cosmic Top Secret/ATOMAL (Nato)So Joseph "Jay" Cafasso wants everyone to believe that he has access to the Whitehouse with a Yankee White clearance.
. Cafasso is taking the same tired old action we've seen in the past against the people he thinks might be onto him and completely fed up with his crap.
t to have people point it out? Gee, it looks as though we're not supposed to do that in Joe Cafasso's world. He's supposed to continue getting away with it, right??? WRONG.“I told [told [CENSORED]…you should have just used a suppressor and blew him [Jack], blew him away,” Cafasso later said during a meeting in Washington, DC.(Hunt for Bin Laden, p. 249) Yes, Kathryn, it's not made up, it's for real, your boyfriend really said it, it's on tape.
Apparently, Cafasso and FOX News were upset that CBS 60 Minutes II had obtained captured al-Qaida training footage from the advisor that Cafasso and FOX News had wanted first. Cafasso was willing to go to any lengths to get exclusive FOX coverage, even through an assassination.
This one is no longer there, but you can take a look and see that the picture he ripped off and stuck in the left hand corner is the same one he has up at Stuporpatriots with his own image photoshopped in with a turban on his head as mini-me. Mini-me will have his personal awakening, his epiphany soon enough-very soon.
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Editor's note: Reporter/photographer Paul Dunn is traveling with a group of Greenville men delivering relief supplies and providing assistance to the area near Thibodaux, La. This is a report on their third day in the field.
THIBODAUX, La. – Despite growing frustration over the pace and substance of the disaster relief effort here, members of Greenville's Cajun Country Convoy kicked themselves into high gear on Monday to help victims of Hurricane Katrina.
The Greenville men – Dick Carney, 66, of Peace Presbyterian Church; Randy Riddle, 50, of Hollywood Presbyterian Church; Danny Gonzalez, 50, of Covenant United Methodist Church and Homer Tyre, 24, of The Memorial Baptist Church – were partially hampered Monday by President Bush's trip to the Gulf Coast.
Security concerns all but shut down relief missions within a 25-mile radius of the president's entourage, said Jay Cafasso, who is overseeing logistics for the Thibodaux-based religious relief effort, dubbed J2K.
Several members of the convoy were poised to accompany other relief workers into New Orleans on Monday, but were grounded by the president's visit.
The quartet has worked the past couple of days inside the Thibodaux Fireman's Fair Office and Warehouse, which is being used to store donated supplies. Because of the need there, they have been unable to pursue relief missions to nearby hard-hit areas, such as Houma and Grand Isle, both on the Gulf Cost.
And though they're ready for other challenges, the men have toiled with intensity and good humor inside the 40-by-100 brick and corrugated tin building. The Greenville men were called to Thibodaux at the request of the Rev. Bill Crawford of Thibodaux First Presbyterian Church.
Crawford is helping coordinate the joint undertaking between Catholic Community Services and Presbyterian churches affiliated with the Presbyterian Disaster Relief agency.
Since arriving in this southeast Louisiana bayou town of 14,200 on Saturday afternoon, Greenville's relief workers have unloaded supplies, built four 32-foot-long shelving units and stacked and sorted mountains of food, clothing, paper products, tools, cleaners and other items intended for Katrina's victims. Monday, the men united their muscles and brains for the ultimate warehouse push.
The result: "God's Depot South," a Cajun Country Convoy grocery store. They'd decided Monday morning to spend their day stocking the plywood shelving units they'd built the day before, but before they were 30 minutes into their job, Riddle had an idea.
"I know. Let's arrange the food like it was a grocery store," he told the others. "Just think of yourselves as grocery clerks."
Without so much as a dirty word or blink of an eye, the three other men got to it. Soon, the place was an indoor farmer's market waiting to happen.
"I've got corn. I've got carrots. I've got peas, and I've got yams," Riddle sing-songed as he stacked canned vegetables.
Before you knew it, his buddies were needling him, laughing as they did.
"Hey," Riddle responded. "Just call me ‘the grocery store stock boy Nazi.' ”
Little by little, back and leg muscles by back and leg muscles, the shelves began to fill.
A fortress of stacked soup cans anchored the middle of one shelf, an equally impressive barricade of canned vegetables another. Bulk cans occupied their own places of distinction – peas, carrots, soup, ketchup.
Other food species, though lonely in their separateness, were more distinctive: A can of "Robert Rothschild Farm Onion Blossom Horseradish Dip" sat segregated on the shelf, as did a can of "Olde Cape Cod Gourmet Lobster Bisque."
Nearby, 32 cans of sardines in soybean oil waited for a lucky recipient, as did one can of "Tropical Red Papaya in Light Syrup."
Someone would get four packs of Spam, too – perhaps more than they bargained for.
The mere mention of the canned meat, called "Spamtabulous" by its manufacturers, elicited groans from everyone except Tyre, an ex-U.S. Marine.
"Ummm, Spam, that's some good stuff!" he said. "I love Spam."
As the men got the last of the supplies on the shelves, Gonzalez rejoiced.
"I'm kind of running on adrenaline," he said. "I'm tickled to death to get this stuff organized."
The men are hoping for a different kind of adrenaline rush, today.
They're ready to escape the Thibodaux Fireman's Fair Office and Warehouse.
"I'm just kind of dismayed by the effort, so far," Riddle said. "We've accomplished some good things, but we're ready to get out and directly help some people."
Tyre says "mental constipation" is causing the operation to drag. "I think they (organizers) have this Third World attitude here, and the situation is bad, yes, but not like that," he contended. "They're over-thinking."
-----You are a bald faced liar.
She's talking about Cramer there, and then she goes onto explain why she said that.
Here is an excerpt from her conversation with Jossi at Wikipedia about edits on Joe Cafasso (see here):
I am of two minds about whether to comment here, since I am not a neutral observer. It is notable and fairly well established that Cafasso and Jack Idema have a feud going.
A feud? The grab from the left is from Kathryn Cramer dot Com. from the sidebar on the right. Click here, and it opens up. Lol…a “feud”; Is that what you call it? The Colonel That Wasn’t stole your computer, lied about who he is, lied about his health, disappeared and turned up in Mississippi and did it to other people, and you put up a ‘call for information’ but it’s Idema and Cafasso that are having a feud? Give me a break.
I would say that the evidence tells me that YOU and Cafasso have a feud going, lol…why are you looking for him, again? Wasn’t it because he lied to you? Doesn’t he lie to everyone? Doesn’t Cafasso ‘have a feud going’ with the WORLD [when people stop believing him]???
Here are few pieces of evidence that can be cited: Idema is known to have co-written Robin Moore’s book The Hunt for Bin Laden (Idema even appers on the cover). (As I recall this is discussed in Robert Young Pelton’s Licensed to Kill.) The book contains an unfavorable discussion of Cafasso. Idema quotes from the book, using it as a reference on his official website ( Superpatriots.us) concerning Cafasso. HOWEVER, if you check the text of the passages Idema quotes, he has rewritten them to claim that Cafasso tried to get him killed. Also, Cafasso was a defendent in one of Idema’s lawsuits. The documents concerning the existence of the law suit are public record on the site of a Los Angeles court. Quotng from public record court docs would be a more appropriate way to document the feud than Caosblog.
Let’s check those passages, shall we? Let’s take a look at the book in question, but let’s also remember how idiotic this woman sounds. Remember, I’m not making up that Cafasso stole her computer, charged an expensive hotel bill on her credit card (which she apparently didn’t check) and that she claims he owes her 20 grand. These are indisputable facts admitted to by Ms. Cramer herself:
I am interested in receiving information concerning the life and activities of former Fox News Military & Counterterrorism Editor Joseph A. Cafasso aka Joe Cafasso, Jay Cafasso, Gerry Blackwood, Gerard Pal Blackwood, Jay Mosca, J. Mosca, James Mosca, Joseph Mosca, Jay Anthony, Tom Adams, and Jake Adams.
He stole my computer and owes me about twenty grand.
Of particular interest are:
* other known aliases
* information concerning debts & unpaid financial obligations
* incidents involving computer equipment or credit cards
* medical conditions
* employment history
* documentation such as photographs, videotapes, audiotapes
* transcripts or other documentation concerning public events he attended
* documents he presented
I’m sure the reason you’re ‘calling for information’ isn’t to ‘defame him’, lol…, right? It’s only anybody else who writes about the guy who is defaming Cafasso, according to you, which puts you in the only privileged position to write about him.
I’m not sure what Cafasso’s being a defendent in one of Idema’s lawsuits has to prove except that since he doesn’t have two pennies to pinch together and is hungry to dip his grubby hands into grants given to Christian ministries, I would imagine he’s pretty angry about that. He reacts very strongly when his lines of BS are no longer accepted or believed by people, we’ve seen that pretty clearly here at his Stuporpatriots blog.
Considering his psychiatric profile, it would seem as though he would be capable of just about anything in retaliation, wouldn’t it? At least to a reasonable person. This is also from your website:
At present he is apparently a very unhappy man, as Mendehall Ministries in Mendenhall, Mississippi (near Jackson) seems to have failed to appreciate his recent involvement in their finances as Director of Development. I’m told he feels very sorry for himself and claims the pressing need for surgery & a lawsuit.
There is so much evidence out there that demonstrates that Cafasso is a very dishonest person, but now, we’re supposed to set all that aside in the case of Jack Idema and listen to Psychos R US.; Cramer, and Cafasso; over the evidence:
Clearly this is another of the numerous examples of Cramer’s lies and defamation of me and Idema and frankly, I’m getting sick and tired of it showing up again and again. Back to the entry at Wikipedia:
Though, in general, I disagree with Jossi’s stance on blogs, Caosblog and its cousins (Tracking Cafasso etc.) are intentionally defamatory of Cafasso. While some of what they have to say about Cafasso is true and sourced, they co-mingle it defamatory nonsense with fact and like Idema they sometimes rewrite material that seems sourced.
Interesting, Kathryn. You mean like in the book “The Hunt For Bin Laden”, right here?
The quote is DIRECTLY OUT OF THE BOOK, you stupid b*** but if you have the first edition printing, which was rushed to press, you won’t see it. Subsequent versions, including the paperback and the MacMillan version, all have that quote EXACTLY AS QUOTED, and nobody at the Superpatriots website rewrote anything.
Where is the comingling of defamatory statements? I missed that. Just as in the case of the photo album she said I had of her son- that didn’t exist, just as in the case of claiming I was stalking her and her family, and just as in the case of Michael Teague, Mookie Spicoli and all the other examples I’ve talked about here, Kathryn Cramer is not only off-base, she is lying. Either that, or she’s as dumb as a rock, but either way, the results would be the same.
Here is a dingbat that is seriously drawing conclusions on the basis of lies out of Joe Cafasso’s rotting mouth. It was one thing when she didn’t know his identity. But it’s completely another thing now that she knows who he is. what he’s done to numerous people, and is still standing by it. This is amazingly stupid. And Cramer works as a ‘researcher’ for Wolfram Research?
The reason the quote was not complete in the first Random House editions was because the lawyers were confirming the authenticity of the actual taperecordings and matching Cafasso’s voice. They even got outside legal counsel opinions on it to make sure they were covered.
Cafasso lies, Kathryn. You’d think that you would have realized that by now, since he STOLE YOUR COMPUTER and charged a huge hotel bill on your American Express card under completely false pretenses. Cafasso raises hell over complete fabrications-just ask the people at Mendenhall Ministries in Mississippi. You’re fully aware of that, you swallowed the Gerry Blackwood with the patch over his eye story…lol - the “Beyond the Call” story, and numerous others, which don’t exactly paint this guy as a bastion of truth telling, yet for some reason you’re willing to believe he’s telling the truth about Idema.
With all that I’ve put up about Idema, you’d think that someone with even a small pea-brain would be able to figure out that if he was what Cafasso says he is, he would easily have been dead by now. But no, Cafasso is a liar about everything except Idema.
Lie in one, lie in them all.
I know it’s a lot to expect from Kathryn Cramer, but instead of listening to Joe Cafasso’s sob stories, she really ought to get her facts straight.
Kathryn Cramer has absolutely no business editing Wikipedia. Cramer should have been STOPPED from writing her own bio, her husband’s bio, putting up information on Idema, putting up information on Cafasso, and linking to herself. She should not be allowed to create accolades to herself out of thin air. Cramer is entertaining complete fantasies about her alleged literary prowess, which is little more than bad science fiction writing. She has a completely out-of-control imagination; not to mention, an amazing sense of hubris and inability to face reality. Someone with a fertile imagination who can’t discern between reality and fantasy needs some serious psychological help, in my amateur opinion.
But that is where she’s exactly like Joe Cafasso and the two of them completely deserve each other.
There is no greater satisfaction than looking at Cramer - wearing that ugly green bathrobe with mud on her face. That is a picture that I will remember for time immemorial.
Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law - Cite This Source
Main Entry: de·fa·ma·tion
Pronunciation: “de-f&-’mA-sh&n
Function: noun
1 : communication to third parties of false statements about a person that injure the reputation of or deter others from associating with that person —see also LIBEL, SLANDER New York Times Company v. Sullivan in the IMPORTANT CASES section —compare DISPARAGEMENT, FALSE LIGHT, SLANDER OF TITLE
CoolWebPoll
CoolWebPoll
joe cafasso